Hacker Uses AI Agents to Breach More Than 100 Company Websites

A Chinese-speaking hacker used commercially available AI agents to break into websites of more than 100 companies, including Deere, SharkNinja and Cummins, according to a Reuters investigation published on 19 October 2026. The campaign began on 25 September and mainly targeted e-commerce sites in the United States, Canada, Australia and Japan. The attacker wrote fewer than 100 Chinese characters of instructions and left the agents to do most of the work. An estimated $5,000 in AI usage costs is uncertain, and it is not yet known how much data was taken. For any business that automates work, the lesson is to treat the AI tools and the vendor websites around them as part of the security perimeter.
In short
- A Chinese-speaking hacker reportedly used off-the-shelf AI agents to target more than 100 company websites, starting 25 September 2026.
- The cost estimates differ, so treat the $5,000 total as uncertain.
- Exposed control panels for AI agent platforms were how the campaign was found.
- Vendor websites and admin panels are the first things to check in any automated workflow.
- No public evidence yet shows how much data was taken.
What happened
According to a Reuters investigation published on 19 October 2026, a Chinese-speaking hacker used commercially available AI agents to break into websites tied to more than 100 companies. The named victims include farm equipment maker Deere, appliance company SharkNinja and engine maker Cummins. The reported campaign started on 25 September and focused on e-commerce sites in the United States, Canada, Australia and Japan.
The activity came to light through NorForge, a security firm. Its principal threat researcher, Snorre Fagerland, found about two dozen exposed control panels for Cairn, an open-source platform that coordinates AI agents. Fagerland said the hacker gave the agents brief instructions, then let them probe more than 1,200 sites. Successful intrusions typically took about 23 hours of automated testing.
Deere told Reuters that it had taken remediation steps and had no indication that sensitive information was accessed. SharkNinja said the affected site was a standalone product support website and that the threat was contained. Cummins said it was investigating a report about a website run by one of its third-party vendors. Reuters could not establish how much data, if any, was taken. Two smaller businesses also confirmed they had been compromised.
Why it matters for businesses that automate work
The part that should interest operations heads is the cost. Fagerland estimated the campaign used about $5,000 in AI tokens, or roughly $50 per successful intrusion. NorForge later put its own estimate at roughly $5 per task, including failed attempts, and warned that the margin of error is wide. The two figures are not the same measure, and neither is a verified budget. The direction of travel is still clear: one person, a few instructions and a set of agents can test far more doors than a human team could.
The campaign also turned the automation tools themselves into a weak point. The exposed Cairn dashboards reportedly showed targets, findings and, in some cases, stolen credentials. A business that runs its own agents, workflow tools or vendor portals can make the same mistake without meaning to, by leaving a control panel reachable from the open internet.
What changes in practice
Most firms do not need a new security programme this week. They need a short list of the places where automated work touches the public web, and a named person who checks it. The table below sets out four starting points. The steps apply whether you have five staff or five thousand. A smaller firm can often ask its web host or software provider for the answers in a single call. A larger group needs them written into a register.
| Exposure point | What to check | Who owns it |
|---|---|---|
| Admin or control panels for internal tools | Confirm none are reachable from the open internet, and that each requires a login | IT lead or outside provider |
| Vendor websites that take customer data or orders | Ask the vendor for its latest security test results and a list of who holds admin access | Operations head with procurement |
| Shop software and plugins | Confirm that security updates are applied on a fixed schedule, not when someone remembers | Web or e-commerce team |
| AI agent accounts and API keys | Give each agent its own key with the narrowest permissions it needs, rotate keys, and keep a log of actions | Finance or IT lead |
Two habits matter more than the tools. First, keep a written record of every automated workflow, including the systems it reads and writes. Second, when a vendor is compromised, check what your own automation can still reach through that vendor's login. Many firms learn about this link only after an incident.
Limits
Automation can run the checks, but it cannot decide what risk you accept. A script can list open panels or stale keys. It cannot confirm that a vendor's code is safe, and it cannot tell you whether data has already left. Those judgements still belong to a person who knows the business.
What to watch next
Three things will show how serious the campaign was. The first is whether Cummins confirms the scope of the vendor breach. The second is whether NorForge publishes more on the other exposed instances, which it said were likely malicious. The third is whether the cost estimates converge. Until then, the $5,000 figure should be read as an estimate, not a settled number.
How AiStaffo would automate this
An AiStaffo audit would start by listing every automated workflow and the systems it reads and writes, including vendor portals, shop software and any AI agent dashboards. Our AI workers would then run scheduled checks against that list, flagging any admin page that answers from the open internet, any key without a named owner, and any vendor login that reaches more than one system. The results would go to the operations head as a short report. A person would still decide which fixes to apply and who keeps access. Book a free automation audit.
Questions people ask
Which companies were affected by the AI agent hacking campaign?
How much did the AI agent attack cost?
Was customer data stolen in this campaign?
What is Cairn and why did it matter?
What should a business check after this news?
Does this mean automation is not worth using?
Book a free automation audit
Thirty minutes. We look at one process you run every week and tell you exactly what an AI worker would take off your desk, and what it would not.


































